点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
凝心聚力建设宜居宜业和美乡村******
凝心聚力建设宜居宜业和美乡村(大家谈·一起来想一起来干③·新时代新征程新伟业 )
民族要复兴，乡村必振兴。党的二十大报告提出：“全面推进乡村振兴。全面建设社会主义现代化国家，最艰巨最繁重的任务仍然在农村。”本期大家谈，我们选刊3篇来稿，共同探讨如何在新征程上更好推进乡村振兴事业，为建设宜居宜业和美乡村凝心聚力。
——编 者
接续奋斗提升幸福指数
天津蓟州区 李 通
作为一名驻村干部，我有幸参与到推进乡村振兴的火热实践中，深感使命光荣、责任重大。党的二十大报告提出“加快建设农业强国”“发展乡村特色产业”“统筹乡村基础设施和公共服务布局”，为全面推进乡村振兴擘画了宏伟蓝图。
全面推进乡村振兴，必须坚持以人民为中心的发展思想，做到一切为了人民、一切依靠人民。我所在的工作队，结对帮扶了两个经济薄弱村。我们通过持续实地走访、深入调研、论证分析，精准把脉村庄在产业、人才、文化、生态、组织等方面存在的薄弱环节，对症开方、精准施策。从带领村集体成立农业科技公司促进农副产品销售，到依托教育资源优势为村庄发展贡献智慧力量，再到利用村庄闲置空地种植太阳花打造“网红打卡地”，实践充分表明，把老百姓满意不满意、认可不认可作为评价工作的重要指标，把一件件好事办好、实事办实，就能不断提升群众的幸福指数。
实现乡村全面振兴不可能一蹴而就，需要持续发力、久久为功、善作善成。面向未来，我们工作队将继续努力，把富民政策一项一项落实好，让老乡们生活越来越红火。
党建引领激发内生动力
湖南湘潭市 黎孟秋
治国安邦重在基层。党的二十大报告提出，“坚持大抓基层的鲜明导向，抓党建促乡村振兴”。对我们基层干部而言，当务之急正在于加强基层党组织建设，以党建引领基层治理，抓好党建促进乡村振兴。
全面推动乡村振兴，必须切实加强基层党组织建设。一方面，要夯实坚强堡垒，持续开展软弱涣散党组织排查整顿、基层党组织整建提质等行动，形成党建引领、支部带头、党员在前的干事创业格局。另一方面，要锻造过硬队伍，通过加强基层党组织建设，引领带动各类人才脱颖而出、大放光彩。近年来，我所在的乡镇健全完善墩苗历练、严管厚爱、择优选用工作机制，选优配强村级党支部，逐渐形成一支信念过硬、政治过硬、责任过硬、能力过硬、作风过硬的乡村振兴干部队伍。
蓝图已绘就，奋斗正当时。以实际行动把党的二十大作出的重大部署落地落实，推动乡村振兴不断迈上新台阶，是基层干部的职责所在。以党建引领激发乡村振兴的内生动力，必能绘出新时代乡村振兴锦绣画卷。
文化发展助力乡村振兴
吉林长春市 魏志宇
乡村振兴既要塑形，也要铸魂。推动乡村文化振兴，让人民享有更加充实、更为丰富、更高质量的精神文化生活，有助于改变广大农民精神面貌，激发乡村振兴的内生动力。
近年来，吉林艺术学院通过艺术乡建参与到乡村振兴中，努力探索艺术助力乡村文化振兴的方式方法。以吉林省长春市其塔木镇刘家村为例，我们通过挖掘整理7项非遗与民族民俗文化，共同策划与执行农民丰收节，开展丰富多彩的文艺活动；依托墙绘改善村落环境，提升文化氛围；参与关云德满族民俗博物馆建设，让乡村博物馆留存乡愁记忆；以中国重要农业文化遗产“吉林九台五官屯贡米栽培系统”为依托，探索新媒体上农特产品的宣传与销售……这些实践启示我们，文化、艺术介入美丽乡村建设，是新时代乡村振兴的重要抓手，也是新时期“三农”发展的有效路径。
党的二十大对全面推进乡村振兴提出了更高要求。我们将不忘初心、砥砺前行，围绕地域独特的乡土文化、民族艺术等开展更多维度的艺术乡建，进一步推动艺术走近农民、走向农村，为乡村文化振兴做出新的贡献。（人民日报）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
快盈v地图 |
)